Jump to content
Please check your junk folder for registration emails ×

BlkPnthr

General Member
  • Posts

    823
  • Joined

Posts posted by BlkPnthr

  1.  G-unit']

    never been a fan of the legacys with that front kit, that a rev d? rims are nice tho

    Yup it's a rev D, each to their own i guess, i quite like that kit

    [quote name='Enervated said:

    Sorry,, stupid question coming... What you mean by rev d ? ??? :-

    In that model legacy, as the years went by, they came out with different "revisions" (A, B, C and D). Essentially just signalled mostly minor changes. Rev D was the last and came out in 2001-2002 (and a few at the start of 2003). Yours is a Rev D and for that revision they changed compression, tunable ECU, different headlights and grill etc

  2.  funkytown']

    well its slightly lower compression iirc and they are less det prone, so winning there.

    nothing really noticeably different tbh from rev d otherwise. rev d has slightly better power delivery through VOD.

    I'm not an authority on the subject, but from what i've read on the interwebs, Rev A-C basically the same, whereas Rev D got slight cosmetic changes (i.e. grill and headlights), revised compression, flashable ECU and possibly even lighter bonnet?. So i think it's the D with compression change, not C? Again, i'm happy to be corrected.

    [quote name='ODB said:

    and flashable ECU?

    Sorry, that's only the D, not C :-\ {i]aggh, not fast enough[/i] ;)}

  3. Are you sure you're interested in a Subaru? Seems you have nothing good to say about them. A Legacy of that era (and most newer/unmodified ones too), will never compare to a Skyline, they were never built to. Legacy's are more aimed towards being a business and sports car.. comfortable but with a bit of go.

    As for reliability, you'll find many on here that will attest to the fact that they're reliable just so long as you look after and maintain them properly. I've owned 3 so far, ranging from '95 - '05, and never had any major problems.

    As for what's good, nothing like a few test drives to sort that out

  4. I think people hate on them if they've experienced troubles with them in the past. No doubt the BP/BL is a nicer car, but so are generally all newer models. Nothing wrong with BH's if you treat them nicely, which is the same with all Subarus IMO

  5.  petrolheadjman']

    [quote name='RAYDEO said:

    You may have just hit the nail on the head there mate!!!

    Ok here's one for all you legacy lOvers,

    Bh legacy GT-B E tune or Be legacy B4 RSK REV-D

    What's the difference apart from the obvious?

    Let the duel begin!

    /quote]

    correct me if i'm wrong but the E-Tune stands for economy so less power? revision D is the way to go however. alloy bonnet? and will be newer / better condition and stuff. Lights look cooler too

    what about a legacy sedan with the ez30?

    I'm fairly sure you're wrong on that one, as far as I'm aware E-tune is just cosmetic changes? Not claiming to know that for sure though.

    And isn't the only other difference between the two the obvious bit? Don't think there was a difference in parts or performance between the sedan and wagon..

    [Edit] Just found this which implies we're both right: http://www.uklegacy.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=114283

  6. I went through this, ended up getting a loan for some extra cash and buying a V10 :D Best decision i ever made too, only ever regretted selling it. When i was looking at something to buy a couple of years ago, ended up with a 2.8L BMW.. really liked it for a while, and thought i wanted the nicer ride etc, but eventually got bored of it and am now back in a GTB and wanting an STI. Each to their own though

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 164 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...