Yea I've roughly been through the calcs too, get that side of it but aren't dyno's reading torque values rather than power so shouldn't torque always be a reliable figure? Or do they just get a raw figure thats then manipulated by gear ratio's and wheel diameters to allow a power calc to be made and then for some dyno's they show the calculated value rather than the unadjusted one? Just intrigued why some dyno's show huge torque values and others have expected ones whilst still giving relatively consistant power values
So when people say they have Xnm atw is that actually correct saying it that way? Or since you've had to include wheel diameters, gear ratio's and final drive ratio's is that not then considered flywheel values again. Why else would you go to the effort to calculate out any gains created. Torques the turning force at the centre of the axis so shouldn't wheel diameter be the only factor that needs to be considered.
There's obviously different methods of collecting this data that different brands use but say this one measures the turning force the car creates against its rollers. Could that then be the figure they show rather than the torque at the centre axis of the wheels?
Think I might just spend a few days doing a lot more reading.
Can't seem to find any real info for dynotorque dyno's though, don't suppose they go by another name anyone knows of?
There's the metric one
Power (kW) = Torque (N.m) x Speed (RPM) / 9.5488
So then Torque = power x 9.5488 / speed