I don't know where all the "Electronic monitoring" s*** has come from. It seems like a total invention by some people who have done 2+2 and gotten 47.   IMO the only "monitoring" will be that when you go for a WoF, if your RUCs are out you get a s***-o-gram in the mail 2 weeks later, just like it normally works. What would be the point in doing real-time RUCs?  

This got a few comments on the FB Page so we'll carry on here eh?   Theories & conspiracies lets GO!   https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/how-the-government-is-preparing-to-ditch-petrol-tax-move-all-cars-to-road-user-charges/ILWBW5WS75A4ZN6V4GLFM2QLRA/     "Electronic" monitoring what?!

yes that is one option, still I will run the standalone any day of the week. But for everyone else, a reflash with everything stock is more than enough, go with speed density is always going to be more expensive, normally you will want a “bigger” map (to have more room), and you have to install a IAT sensor, for most is a deal breaker.

Why not just flash the stock ecu to use map and not maf with something MerpMod. Then you can tune without those limitations.

Idle is always crap after a reset as it needs to relearn so don’t look too closely into that.  Those learning view corrections are a bit high but not in the idle region    Have you got an aftermarket intake or anything on the car? The two mid figures would indicate something not 100% right  But since they’re still in a region where you’re not really making positive pressure in the manifold it doesn’t specifically point to a leak.    This is based on how it looks in the old windows program but still helpful.