DPI

Call 0-800 MR PLOW... Hey, look, someone left their WRX out in the sun and it's melted...

I imagine he could...

Fair nuff. What did he have to say about it?

Don't 2002 wheels have Airbags?

Spec God, i think i just threw up a little bit...

how are ver 8 and 9 spec C's softer than yours? the S203 and S204 arent as hardcore as the S202 is. But id say a ver9 spec C is more of a weapon than a ver7 spec C in terms of having a better engine, bigger hubs and wider wheels and tyres. And i say NOT...and i've driven both, so i'd know wouldn't i. V9 does NOT have a better engine than a V7, it's the other way round (remeber the title of the thread...subaru's, like all other makes are getting softer, not harder). And as for bigger hubs and wider tyres, are you serious? Try 250-300kg more weight too... Good joke... what kind of crack have you been smoking? a V9 spec C is only 30kg more than your car (depending if you have got the 16 or 17in models) And the twin scroll GDB engines are BETTER than a V7 engine in terms of torque band, torque output and easly played with to grab more power. Ive driven a ver9 and a ver7 (in normal sti form) and im pretty sure what most people would pick. Altho you are intitled to your own opinion, if based on fact or not You just mensioned that you have driven both (in STI from), so I believe it is YOU who's opinion may or not be based on fact. Go away, drive a few Spec C's and then weigh in huh? Spec C's are NOT STI's, and the V7 Spec C has the same torque as a V8 V9 Spec C. Same power output too, but is considerably lighter (min 100kg, did you pull the 30kg outa your ass?), has more aggressive cams, factory flowed heads, proper forged pistons and runs 1.5bar STD. It was the ONLY spec C to be used for WRC. V8 and V9 Spec C's only WISH they had this...But, the factory was too busy fitting them with Airbag Steering wheels, electric windows and other pedestrian ****. Try to get over the look of the headlights people...and, by the way, it's not MY car anymore... Honestly, some of you guys are so sycophantic, i'm supprised you haven't swallowed the SUBARU coolaid and all replaced your rides with that brand new monstrosity that poses as an STI now. NEWER IS BETTER, NEWER IS BETTER...keep believing it...

No, they can't. Maybe, if everyone on here had told him it WAS an STI, then i could believe it. But sadly, even the most moronic d1ckhead, on being repeatedly told it's not, must finally realise this, and change post to reflect it, unless he's out to rip people off! And, even if he is so dim witted as to still believe it's an STI, the condition you've described means this thing is a complete pig, maybe worth $8000 at best. Where does he get off describing it as possibly the tidiest STI in the country? Stop defending the moron, he's a FUUCKEN CNUT and we all know it.

And, being NZ New, SUBARU NZ won't snub you...

Yeah, maybe, but he definately knows now, but refuses to change details; therefore, he is knowingly mis-representing the vehicle. So, he's moved from IDIOT, to IDIOT who is selling a car fraudulently.

Same here...

Got a pair of WRX (wonder if they are Singapore spec STI ones) seats for the Safari... Should make it a bit more comfortable... Should have a pair of WRX seat rails for sale in a week or two if anybody is keen...

Correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't this the limited edition South Auckland/Hamiltron Spec WRX? ;D

Nah, i think there are definately more 'TRUE' enthusiasts driving subaru's than there are driving Porsches. If you cut out the wank wank (i'm rich and can afford a Porsche) factor, you wouldn't be left with many Porsche drivers... And, as for BMW's and Mercs...wow. From what i've seen rouns Auckland, 3 out of every 4 of them are lowered on Chomes, driven by Ali G wanabe's...

Yes, yes they are... 8)

Remember, gearing plays a role too. Many car's may be quicker to 100kph than a spacific Porsche, but run outta puff quickly due to gearing...

I'd say malicious: 1) He knows he brought a WRX, not an STI (this has been confirmed for him many, many times over! 2) He knows the speedo, along with many other parts are not original! 3) As he drives it, i would have to believe he also noticed the car was a BAG OF SH1T (just like the AA tester)! 4) He is still sticking to the original story that it is a ficticous Singapore STI model, in amazing condition with very, very low km's. How is that not malicious, he is aware he has seriously mis-represented his vehicle and continues to do so...

It's what i found on the net...grain of salt please...

With an over the top 'RICER' kit like that, i'm supprised it's not rollin on 20inch CHOMES... ;D Like this?

how are ver 8 and 9 spec C's softer than yours? the S203 and S204 arent as hardcore as the S202 is. But id say a ver9 spec C is more of a weapon than a ver7 spec C in terms of having a better engine, bigger hubs and wider wheels and tyres. And i say NOT...and i've driven both, so i'd know wouldn't i. V9 does NOT have a better engine than a V7, it's the other way round (remeber the title of the thread...subaru's, like all other makes are getting softer, not harder). And as for bigger hubs and wider tyres, are you serious? Try 250-300kg more weight too... Good joke... Thus by your reasoning the GC type RA is the lightest "comp spec" wrx thus best? Not quite, but it is very light (with the early non STI version being around 1120ish kg's). Unfortunately, the GC RA's didn't get enough power or tourque to make them the outright best, but a good model non the less. The 22B, despite not having the highest HP or Tourque output, looks to be the fastest to 100kph, however, with 4.2 seconds.

I was waiting to see the motorway version for Auckland...

how are ver 8 and 9 spec C's softer than yours? the S203 and S204 arent as hardcore as the S202 is. But id say a ver9 spec C is more of a weapon than a ver7 spec C in terms of having a better engine, bigger hubs and wider wheels and tyres. And i say NOT...and i've driven both, so i'd know wouldn't i. V9 does NOT have a better engine than a V7, it's the other way round (remeber the title of the thread...subaru's, like all other makes are getting softer, not harder). And as for bigger hubs and wider tyres, are you serious? Try 250-300kg more weight too... Good joke...

Never let the facts get in the way of a realy funny story...

Ugly wheels, ugly body kit, ugly rear wing and pointless fake (wannabe) roof scoop...yep, belongs on here alright.

Or just cut, gut and shut the cat...be louder.

Really? I was told not...