Witness says "take the turbo charged cars away from young drivers"

[funkytown]

 Swindog said:

Loren, grow a nut.

just ignore - you found that list?

[Guest loren]

 funkytown']

[quote name='Swindog said:

Loren, grow a nut.

/quote]

just ignore - you found that list?

Awe, I'm on a secret list? I'm so flattered.

This thread is the lowest common denominator.

[funkytown]

his version of the same thing i worked out above. Sorry nothing to do with you and back on topic.

[Guest loren]

This thread is for middle class kids trying to sound street smart and cool :

[gazzy2000]

 loren said:

This thread is for middle class kids trying to sound street smart and cool :

yip, then what are you doing here? the lower class/dump rats and losers thread on the same topic is else where ;D

wheres the upper middle class thread?

[Guest loren]

 gazzy2000']

[quote name='loren said:

This thread is for middle class kids trying to sound street smart and cool :

/quote]

yip, then what are you doing here?

trying to destroy the thread, obviously.

[GC8E2DD]

Funky, where does your 1.6 multiplier come from? I take it you don't mean the MSNZ equivalence factor for forced induction which is not 1.6

This Being Schedule A

[funkytown]

 GC8E2DD said:

Funky, where does your 1.6 multiplier come from? I take it you don't mean the MSNZ equivalence factor for forced induction which is not 1.6

This Being Schedule A

partly just made up and partly from a discussion i was having with Madmike (on totally unrelated matters). I think it was a rally specific thing.

arr there you go as per shedule A - so i was close. We'll call my multiplier made up its the general point im trying to make.

Forced Induction = 1.7

• Rotary Engine = 1.8

• Two stroke = 1.8

[deathz0r]

Cleaned up.

Keep it on-topic.

[Swindog]

Its somewhere, i will find it.

[Guest]

 gazzy2000 said:

i like turtles

back on topic: i still reckon it would be better to base it on the actual performance level of each car as opposed to the engine size. but i can see how then engine size might be a bit easier.

[gazzy2000]

 jake_the_muss']

[quote name='gazzy2000 said:

i like turtles

/quote]

back on topic: i still reckon it would be better to base it on the actual performance level of each car as opposed to the engine size. but i can see how then engine size might be a bit easier.

for those that have not seen it

I like turtles... relevance to anything??? = Zero

[ReubenH]

 loren said:

This thread is for middle class kids trying to sound street smart and cool :

No. ITT: Trolls.

[Guest loren]

 ReubenH']

[quote name='loren said:

This thread is for middle class kids trying to sound street smart and cool :

/quote]

No. ITT: Trolls.

right, so baiting trolls makes you what?

[aim]

 jake_the_muss said:

back on topic: i still reckon it would be better to base it on the actual performance level of each car as opposed to the engine size. but i can see how then engine size might be a bit easier.

Like seeing a turbo RX-7 parked in the economy carparks at the airport?

[LAZLO]

anyways the guy drove recklessly and paid for it in the end,just a pity he done it in a subi,if it was a non turbo and he got away we wouldnt hear anything about it,they just always find some way to pick on a crowd,as for the FTP writing all around the scene,i think that was unnecessary,if the gut didnt do anything wrong in the first place there wouldnt of been a chase,a death and another reason to attack car enthusiasts.

thats my 2 cents :D

[Divine]

At my work cars have a grade from A to F. A being your 1.3 ford escort to F being your lambo.

Should use that rating scale, seeing its based off risks.

[LAZLO]

in the end everyone is responsible for their own actions,sad thing is our friends and families are on the road aswell when these idiots are being stupid on the road,so its sort of like a lose lose situation if you look at the bad side of it.

[spicyHam]

The rating system would be horribly complicated if it was going to be fair. I already had a problem with my first car, a Mitsubishi lancer SEi. It was a gutless 1.6 auto SOHC, but because it was a 'lancer' it was associated with faster ones and 3rd party was $550 a year for it.. i looked up a 1.6 corolla (same performance) and that was in the 300s... Unless each model of car was tested individually these sort of situations would be more common and alot worse.

The full license for turbo thing is a great idea.. I drove that lancer till i had my restricted and then an average-ish celica untill i got my full, before getting the leggy.. i had two years of driving experience by then, and thats how it should be.

[Divine]

When I get quotes for my Subaru, I don't mention its a Type R, as anything with "Type R" is a referral, hence higher premium.

And it doesn't say Type R on its rego anyway, so win for me.

[Guest boostcut]

 Divine said:

When I get quotes for my Subaru, I don't mention its a Type R, as anything with "Type R" is a referral, hence higher premium.

And it doesn't say Type R on its rego anyway, so win for me.

so when it gets stolen they will buy you a converted retina?

[aim]

boostcut, it's a Legacy VZ, not an impreza.

[Guest]

 boostcut']

[quote name='Divine said:

When I get quotes for my Subaru, I don't mention its a Type R, as anything with "Type R" is a referral, hence higher premium.

And it doesn't say Type R on its rego anyway, so win for me.

/quote]

so when it gets stolen they will buy you a converted retina?

And here we go again, Stirring shit when its not needed :

[QRAF]

I was nearly hit leaving the helm with the in laws in the car by a blue gt legacy getting chased by up to 5 cop cars it screamed out of pak n save mill st and just missed two cars when he was running a red light as well.

was very intense moment i must say.

I hope they catch the farkers i was like if they hit me i'm going after them lol.

[RAYDEO]

 Divine said:

At my work cars have a grade from A to F. A being your 1.3 ford escort to F being your lambo.

Should use that rating scale, seeing its based off risks.

also, kamineko has a CF impreza. 1.3, Auto = 2L turbo RA running gear... thats still an "A"?