Rev D Reflash - who has done it?

[GorGasmSpecB]

Wasn't me with the def file.  I could never get it to work.  I know Marky got his working somehow though.

 

Raijin performance (I think he has stopped tuning now) did mine in the end.  Took him 5 mins to get connected and running.

[Guest]

33 minutes ago, GorGasmSpecB said:

Wasn't me with the def file.  I could never get it to work.  I know Marky got his working somehow though.

 

Raijin performance (I think he has stopped tuning now) did mine in the end.  Took him 5 mins to get connected and running.

 

Yep Al has left the building at least for know anyway. 

[GorGasmSpecB]

A shame, from my experience he was a great guy.

 

Although I understand there is more to life than tuning random Subaru's from the internet

[A_J_T]

I'm back. 

 

Think this is a def issue but unsure as it appears to be using the correct defs. 

 

Plugged into @patrickc22 car and pulled the rom off it to see whats going on and try find out if its been tuned as a previous owner suggest it has and its running wonky boost levels. when i pulled the rom off it shows all the below information but the "Boost Control - Target" table along with most other tables is not expandable/non editable? 

 

Any suggestions. 

 

 

appears to be using the correct definitions as below 

 

no rush on this just interested to know why it wont read. 

[Andy_Mac]

Yea thats probably all you'll get for that one. In the supported ECU list on Romraider.com its listed as DTC def only so only does trouble code deletion and maybe one or two other things. 

[patrickc22]

I have spoken to @kwi_fozze  He said it was the incomplete definitions

 

He has put me on to a tuner.

 

 

[Kiwi_Fozze]

Someones worked out defs for one specific tt ecu. Unsure if its compatible (fairly sure it is) but theres hope out there. Its a farkin hard set of definitions to work through, but its better than the dtc only defs that are currently "widely" available

[A_J_T]

Got this working by editing one of the definition xml's. details to come when im not so busy. 

@patrickc22 can confirm yours has not been tuned and should be on stock boost close to 14.5 psi 

[A_J_T]

Ok, so I was having a play in the weekend and noticed that when launching ECUFlash it looks for the definition associated to the Internal ID, in this scenario it has identified that the ROM is from an ECU with an Internal ID of: A4SH701H "see first pick below".so it has loaded up the definition from the definition directory that has the matching ID. The Problem is that particular definition is DTC def only so only does trouble code deletion as Andy said above. 

 

 

 

What i then did was took a look in the definition directory and can see someone has written a more in depth definition for the 2002 USDM Legacy b4 with the ID: A4SHC00H

 

 

So what i thought is sure its a different ECU and ID but most of the tables will remain the same. so i edited the A4SHC00H definition and told it to be A4SH701H

 

 

 

And there you go, it now uses that definition.

 

 

 

PS. TT boost management is next level wack ^

[patrickc22]

1 hour ago, A_J_T said:

Ok, so I was having a play in the weekend and noticed that when launching ECUFlash it looks for the definition associated to the Internal ID, in this scenario it has identified that the ROM is from an ECU with an Internal ID of: A4SH701H "see first pick below".so it has loaded up the definition from the definition directory that has the matching ID. The Problem is that particular definition is DTC def only so only does trouble code deletion as Andy said above. 

 

 

 

What i then did was took a look in the definition directory and can see someone has written a more in depth definition for the 2002 USDM Legacy b4 with the ID: A4SHC00H

 

 

So what i thought is sure its a different ECU and ID but most of the tables will remain the same. so i edited the A4SHC00H definition and told it to be A4SH701H

 

 

 

And there you go, it now uses that definition.

 

 

 

PS. TT boost management is next level wack ^

hahaha i love the ps 

i have gotten a newish boost control solenoid from pick a part we will see if the fixes the boost still waiting for a reply on the tune 
but i have been looking at geting an aftermarket boost control solenoid i have looked into these 3 

http://www.trademe.co.nz/a.asp?id=1252732049&cc=602&pid=490338217&hbc=&member_hash=&ct=title-link

 

http://www.trademe.co.nz/a.asp?id=1252732049&cc=602&pid=490338217&hbc=&member_hash=&ct=title-link

 

http://www.trademe.co.nz/a.aspx?id=1251183295

[A_J_T]

@patrickc22 Id just replace the stock boost solenoid, or get a boost T to manage boost until someone will tune it on a 3 port but idk how 3 port works on the TT setup. 

[patrickc22]

1 hour ago, A_J_T said:

@patrickc22 Id just replace the stock boost solenoid, or get a boost T to manage boost until someone will tune it on a 3 port but idk how 3 port works on the TT setup. 

Was thinking of getting this for the tune  http://www.trademe.co.nz/motors/car-parts-accessories/performance/electronics/auction-1252279027.htm

[94 Leone]

you know the USDM never had twin turbo, and don't think they received turbo legacies until the BP'X' either, those maps are gonna be way different

wait, did you copy the defs over so it's manageable? ah. makes sense now.

[A_J_T]

2 hours ago, patrickc22 said:

Was thinking of getting this for the tune  http://www.trademe.co.nz/motors/car-parts-accessories/performance/electronics/auction-1252279027.htm

Better to have ECU manage boost so it can handle correction and tapper boost etc 

[Andy_Mac]

Marky had a whole lot of luck with just a hobbs switch and some sort of non ecu controlled boost setup. Cheap as chips too.

 

Isn't there something weird with using boost controllers/taps where it only controls single turbo boost and can't really control it once it changes to both. 

[A_J_T]

9 hours ago, Andy_Mac said:

Marky had a whole lot of luck with just a hobbs switch and some sort of non ecu controlled boost setup. Cheap as chips too.

 

Isn't there something weird with using boost controllers/taps where it only controls single turbo boost and can't really control it once it changes to both. 

Nope, only the primary has a wastegate so its the same as plumbing in boost control on a WRX or any single setup. 

[94 Leone]

7 minutes ago, A_J_T said:

Nope, only the primary has a wastegate so its the same as plumbing in boost control on a WRX or any single setup. 

Yeah, only the early BG/BD's had wastegates on both turbos.

[Tatenda Stb]

helo guys, if you are stil there can anyone please send me the rev d map which can be edited.

[Gripless]

@JordanfromNZ if he is around...

[Percy]

I think I still have Marky's ones at home, I'll have a look tonight.

 

And on that note, does anyone have a tactrix cable they dont want?

[A_J_T]

This rom is the closest I've ever gotten to having a editible TT rom http://www.romraider.com/forum/download/file.php?id=13729

 

2002/03 JDM Subaru Legacy 2.0TT MT

A4SHC00H

Also as a disclaimer, i was re-readinig this thread and please dont do like i did above "editing defs and re-defining them" unless you really know what you are doiing haha. 

 

 

 

[boostjunkie69]

On 27/10/2015 at 10:39 PM, Marky said:

****N FINALLY

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v625/Markyface/romraiderscreenshot_zpsiiaw9ggx.png

These things have some weird stuff built into the stock tune, time for some trial and error

im interested in the definition file also

[Andy_Mac]

I've just seen old Marky is out and about doing some tuning just not on here so anyone after rev D stuff might get lucky messaging him on FB

 

https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/550913562588472/